Thursday, April 30, 2020

EDF 211-05/14


METHODS AND CONTENT OF TECHNICAL PHILSOPHY (PART TWO)
B. CONTENT OF PHILOSOPHY (CONT'): LOGIC
1. Introduction
It refers to the study of correct reasoning. It deals with the structure and principles of sound arguments. On our daily basis, individuals are engaged in various forms of arguments, where premises/statements are made and conclusions drawn. In most cases, wrong conclusions are arrived at involving wrong premises and undue generalizations. Logic is essential because it stipulates how arguments should be constructed and how fallacies (erroneous beliefs or myths) can be detected and avoided. Within logic, two forms of reasoning can be distinguished:  deductive and inductive.
'
2. Key concepts
a. Mental Operations
1.      Apprehension: Deals  with Conception (simple mental grasp of an  object-without further operation),
2.      Judgment : Mental sentence or proposition(Affirm or deny)
3.      Reasoning: Argument( Drawing Inferences, dealing with premises and conclusion)
      b. Reasoning: Mind's movement from one or more propositions which act as evidence for a final proposition which calls for proof.
c. Propositions: A proposition is any statement with truth value i.e. it can be proved to be true or false. e. g. Stones are cats. Propositions are never assessed in terms of validity. It's either True or False.
d. Arguments: Is a set of Premises (evidential propositions)  and Conclusions(Claiming propositions).
e. Quarrelling: Not same as arguing- some of the statements in an quarrel are not propositions. Quarrelling is more of a psychological activity than it is a Philosophical activity.
3. Some symbols used in logic:
a.       >   If......then...(symbol for Conditionality)
b.      v  Either.....or....(Symbol of disjunction)
c.       ^  Both.....and.....(Symbol of Conjunctionality)
d.      ≡ ....If and only if...(Symbol of Bi-conditionality)
e.        (   ){  }[  ] Brackets are used to separate collective Propositions

4. Dimensions of Mordern logic
In modern philosophy, logic is expressed in two main dimensions:
a. Symbolic logic involving mathematical symbols – application of symbols to explain phenomena e. g a + b = 4: b= 4 – a
b. Analytic logic – prevalently used by analytic philosophers who emphasize the logical analysis of language to arrive at clear  meanings of terms/concepts.
5.  Types of arguments
i. Reductive Arguments ( Reductio ad absurdum)
Reducing a statement to its opposite or absurdity
 P>-P  then -P
If it is not raining then assume it's not raining
ii. Abductive Reasoning
Reasoning from the best possible explanation
ABD1
Given evidence E and candidate explanations H1,…, Hn of E, infer the truth of that Hi which best explains E.
ABD2
Given evidence E and candidate explanations H1,…, Hn of E, infer the truth of that Hi which explains E best, provided Hi is satisfactory/good enough qua explanation.
ABD3
Given evidence E and candidate explanations H1,…, Hn of E, if Hi explains E better than any of the other hypotheses, infer that Hi is closer to the truth than any of the other hypotheses.
 iii. Dialectical Reasoning
Synthesis from a Thesis and Anti thesis. No contradictions allowed
  iv. Deductive Reasoning
This involves reasoning from general to particular instances. In this case, a conclusion is inferred or deduced from  general premises/statements/propositions.
 Properties of a  Deductive argument
a. Validity-( A deductive argument is valid if the conclusion necessarily logically affirms the premises. It is invalid if and only if it has all true premises and a False conclusion)
b. Soundness: (A sound Deductive argument is one  which has  all      actually/factually true premises and true conclusion)
      Examples
1.      All PGDE students are untrained teachers
John is a PGDE student
John is an untrained teacher
2.      All human beings are liable to make mistakes
Mike is a human being
Mike makes mistakes
3.      All human beings have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God
Mary is a human being
Mary has sinned and fallen short of the glory of God
       4. All numbers  ending with 5 and 0 are divisible by 5
            1,964.5 Ends with 5
            conclusion?...........
     Further examples
     Private schools perform well in national exams
                       All Kikuyus are thieves
           All Luos are proud
           All university students are immoral
           Teachers are hard working
           All Philosophers are idiots
           All cats are dogs

The above reasoning has been expressed in syllogism form: the  first two statements need to be stated before the third can follow logically. This type of reasoning is prevalent in philosophy, religion and mathematics.


v. Inductive reasoning (Continue Editing)
     It involves general laws/conclusions being inferred from particular instances. It is the reverse of deductive reasoning. In this type of reasoning, various instances of a given specimen are observed over a period of time. The observation leads to general conclusions/laws being established with some level of probability. This type of reasoning is applicable with empirical sciences.

Example 1:  P1. Most Kenyans are corrupt
                    P2. Otieno is  a Kenyan
..............................................................................
Therefore probably Otieno is corrupt

Example 2: P1. There are 100 mangoes in the basket
                    P2. 70 of the mangoes picked are rotten
...............................................................................
Probably all the 100 mangoes are rotten
                   
   Properties of Inductive reasoning
a Strength: An inductive argument is said to be strong when it is  when it is such that  when the premises are assumed or granted to be true the its conclusion is most likely to be true.
b. Cogency: An argument is Cogent when it is both strong and has actually true premises

6. Selected Fallacies
7. Logic and Education
Students studying science, arts or education should be familiar with the basic rules of logic so as to enable one reason correctly and use language meaningfully throughout their education Endeavour and in life

    





EDF 211-03/14


METHODS AND CONTENT OF TECHNICAL PHILSOPHY (PART ONE)
A. METHODS OF TECHNICAL PHILOSOPHY

            a. Analytical Method (The Rational Method)- (ANM
It emphasizes the need for logical and systematic thinking. Its greatly interested in logic being the art of correct reasoning. It consists of analysis(breaking apart) but culminates in  synthesis(bringing together). It aims at arriving at a clear understanding(clarity of thought). Such thinking must not be haphazard or confusing; it should be clear, making the necessary distinctions separating clearly what is essential, what matters from what is accidental and of less importance.  It is classified as primarily analytical thinking because it cuts an issue into parts, analyses concepts and statements. In addition, the method seeks to analyse concepts, statements and the language used in different contexts in order to clarify and justify meanings. Philosophical synthesis has to do with putting together the various parts of an idea to form a whole. It is used to complement philosophical analysis. Where else analysis breaks an issue into small parts, synthesis brings together the parts. The ultimate end is to see something in its totality, see the inter-relationship and the overall framework. The limitation with the analytic method is its sole reliance on mind as the source of knowledge neglecting ordinary sense experiences. Rational analysis is thus regarded as idealists who do not live in the real world.
Sample analysis can involve breaking aside of arguments/issues by using Elements of Reasoning (EOR) i. e:
1)      Purpose
2)      Questions
3)      Points of view
4)      Information
5)      Inferences
6)      Concepts
7)      Implications
8)      Assumptions
           














b. The Speculative Method (Creativity)-SPM
Also called the metaphysical methodology. To speculate is to make an intelligent/rational guess. It endeavors to challenge the human mind as far as possible, to its ultimate limits in trying to understand what is apparently incomprehensible. Man is not satisfied with knowing what happens to him, he also wants to know why. Basic issues of concern in speculation include difficult topics life like; death, suffering happiness, God. There is no simple answer and many people explain or clarify them in religious terms believing religion will give the final answer.  Philosophers however prefer to explain these issues by use of human reason; they want to challenge the human mind as far as possible in trying to understand the incomprehensible. Speculation is utilized in a research hypothesis.
           







d. Phenomenological Method- PHM
The term phenomenology originated from the Greek word ‘phenomenon’ meaning appearance and logia meaning knowledge. It designates the description or study of appearance especially if the appearances are sustained and penetrating. It considers the actual staring point of investigation to be the actual things as they appear, in their essential reality through experience. Things will appear different from one person to another. A philosopher’s concern is not the differences but to discover the underlying meaning and thus arrive at a deeper understanding of phenomena( ie. noumena). By reflecting on an everyday human experience e.g. Of pain, joy, fear, frustration, a philosopher is able to explain the experience in concrete terms indicating in which manner the experience affects one’s life, whole being or existence. It involves a non-biased, non-prejudiced stance in examining phenomenon. Here, preconceived theoretical speculations are abandoned.















d. Critical Method -CRM
The term ‘critical’ is derived from a Greek verb Krinein meaning to judge according to some set standards. What? It involves subjecting of values, facts, principles, conversations and assumptions; usually taken for granted to severe (socratic) questioning. Why? This is meant to encourage honesty of thought and protect man from Pathogenic tendencies of the human mind (PTM) such as fanaticism and hypocrisy, intolerance and dogmatism, slogans and ideologies in order to liberate man from narrow mindedness. This method is also called the Socratic Method. It is liberating and constructive in the sense that it seeks to evaluate, to judge things in the light of clear and distinct ideas.
A sample Critical method commonly begins with Analysis (questioning along the Elements of Reasoning- EOR) Evaluation (questioning along Universal Intellectual Standards (UIS) with a clear intention of Creating new thinking and self improvement.


Analysis (EOR)
1)      Purpose
2)      Questions
3)      Points of view
4)      Information
5)      Inferences
6)      Concepts
7)      Implications
8)      Assumptions

 Evaluation (UIS))

1)      Clarity
2)      Accuracy
3)      Depth
4)      Breadth
5)      Logic
6)      Significance
7)      Relevance
8)      Precision
Essential traits of Improve mind (ETM

1)      Intellectual Integrity
2)      Intellectual humility
3)      Intellectual Sense of justice
4)      Intellectual Perseverance
5)      Intellectual fair-mindedness
6)      Intellectual confidence in reason
7)      Intellectual courage
8)      Intellectual empathy
9)      Intellectual autonomy




NB: Critical method improves critical thinking by reducing the following Pathogenic Human Tendencies (PTM))

1. Egocentric memory: the natural tendency to forget evidence and information which does not support our thinking and to remember evidence and information which does.
2. Egocentric myopia: the natural tendency to think in absolute terms within an overly narrow point of view.
3. Egocentric infallibility: the natural tendency to think that our beliefs are true because we believe them.
4. Egocentric righteousness: the natural tendency to feel superior in the light of our confidence
that we are in the possession of ‘the truth’.
5. Egocentric hypocrisy: the natural tendency to ignore flagrant inconsistencies between what we profess to believe and the actual beliefs our behaviour implies, or inconsistencies between the standards to which we hold ourselves and those to which we expect others to adhere.
6. Egocentric oversimplification: the natural tendency to ignore real and important complexities in the world in favour of simplistic notions when consideration of those complexities would require us to modify our beliefs or values.
7. Egocentric blindness: the natural tendency not to notice facts or evidence which contradict our favoured beliefs or values.
8. Egocentric immediacy: the natural tendency to over-generalize immediate feelings and experiences--so that when one event in our life is highly favourable or unfavourable, all of life seems either favourable or unfavourable.
9. Egocentric absurdity:
 the natural tendency to fail to notice thinking which has absurd consequences, when noticing it would force us to rethink our position.















EDUCATIONAL NOTES FROM PHILOSOPHICAL METHODS
a. Critical method
1.      Critical Method of Philosophy engenders and propagates critical thinking among learners, teachers and other Educators.

2.      Daily Educational decisions are always based on some criteria which act as bases for Educational judgment for instance ranking of students, appraisal of teachers, establishing of programs.

3.      Educational evaluation: Marking of examinations are based criteria referred to as Marking schemes/marking guides.

4.      Research: A proper research is measured against elements such as data collection, sample sizing, literature review among others, all of which are derivatives of the critical methodology.      

5.      Critical method is also one of the most popular research methods in Educational research, especially in Educational foundations.

b. Analytical Method (The Rational Method)
1.      Analysis as one of the high order thinking is not only used in research but also in examination as part of interrogating learner's abilities to go beyond the given case. For instance a well balance d assessment tests, in evoke the spirit of and the ability to mentally en entertain the process of breaking complex educational realities into atomic realities.

2.      Analytic method is crucial in simplifying and clarifying Educational policies and documents.
3.      Analysis is also used in sciences as methods of experimental investigation
4.      Curriculum reviews and implementation are always sujected to analysis.

c. The Speculative Method (Creativity).
1.      Use to enhance creativity of learner's thought processes and imagination.
2.      Necessary for Heutagogical and andragogical learning
3.      Religious education partially  holds water due to  speculations
d. Phenomenological Method
1.      Observation of reality as is used in natural and social sciences for investigation
2.      Participatory data collection is based on Phenomenology








B. CONTENT OF TECHNICAL PHILOSOPHY
(BASIC SCHOLASTIC BRANCHES OF TECHNICAL PHILOSOPHY)

These are:
I. Epistemology-Study of Knowledge
II. Axiology- Value theory
III. Metaphysics- Study of reality
IV. Logic-Theory of reasoning/Philosophers tool box

I. EPISTEMOLOGY
1. What is Epistemology?
This is the philosophical study of knowledge. Epistemology is derived from two Greek words: episteme (knowledge) and logia (study). It deals with philosophical reflection on issues related to knowledge. Epistemology does not deal with factual knowledge such as that which socio-sciences are involved in. Empirical sciences like Psychology and sociology study issues by describing in a factual manner what they have observed about human knowledge e.g. in cognitive development, a Psychologist will talk about how it differs in relation to age, individual and the society. The philosopher on the other hand will not inform on facts and try to justify as done in hard sciences; instead, he will think before and after the scientist does his work thereby challenging the scientist. Epistemology distinguishes clearly between rationalism (which stresses the role of intellect in knowledge acquisition) and empiricism (pays attention to sense experience).
 It studies the nature, sources and validity of knowledge. It seeks to answer questions like: Among the questions that Epistemology asks include:
What is knowledge?
How do we know?
What is truth?
What can we really know/
What does it mean to say that I know something?
What are the sources of knowledge?

2. Of what relevance to Education
To the extent that education has a cognitive dimension, it is an epistemological activity. Epistemology in Education is exhibited in curriculum content areas (What knowledge is there to be acquired?), in instructional methods (How do we come to know?), in Educational assessment (What does it mean to say that I know something/What is truth), in the role of the teacher and teaching resources(What are the sources of knowledge)……







II. AXIOLOGY
1. What is Axiology?
The term Axiology is derived from Greek words and axia (values) and logos (study) It is the philosophical/rational study of values.

      2. Sub-branches of Axiology
      a. Ethics or moral philosophy – reflects on the origin and nature of moral values: meaning of what is right and wrong. This is the most popular branch of Axiology.
      b. Aesthetics – philosophical study of artistic values. Interested in meaning of beauty and harmony and art.
      c. Social and cultural philosophy – study of values related to societies and cultures
      d. Political philosophy – deals with study of politics, governance etc.

3. Categories of values studied under Axiology
The philosophical study of values is restricted to the prescriptive domains. Values fall under three categories:
a. Objective–values considered being universal (good, truth, beauty, freedom, love).
b. Relative – values that depends on personal preference.
c. Hierarchicalordering values from the least desirable to the most desirable.


4. Axiology and Education
Education is a value laden activity. R. S. Peters, Njoroge &Benaars, Ducassan and other educational stake holders exclude a value-less conception education from their definition of Education. Different disciplines, educational aims methods and players in education have strong groundings in value theory. Consider for instance teacher code of ethics and conduct, normative aims of education in government policies, school rules, class arrangement, uniforms, etc

  III. METAPHYSICS
1. What is Metaphysics?
1.      This term refers to what goes beyond the physics/nature.. It deals with questions, things or concerns that lie after or beyond the physical world of sense experience.  It is the general investigation into the fundamental nature of all reality.
2. Subdivisions of Metaphysics
a.       Cosmology: the study of the universe (cosmos). It has to do with the origin and nature meaning of the universe. This is done rationally.
b.      Theodicy: rational investigation of the supernatural. It belongs to the field of theology where religious concepts and beliefs are assessed.
c.       Rational or philosophical psychology: philosophy of the mind. It investigates into the intricate processes of perceiving, imagining, remembering, feeling, understanding, willing. It attempts to solve the mind/body problem; their composition, nature and relationship e.g. can mind survive destruction of the body?
d.      Ontology: the philosophical study of ‘being’. What is the meaning of existence? What comprises matter? What is man/woman? What is the essence of being? The meaning of Being: Anything Whatsoever that is or exists. Modes of Being : Physical/Material being, Spiritual being
3. First Principles of Metaphysics

                    i.            Principle of Non Contradiction: A thing X cannot at the time be and not be
                  ii.            Principle of Identity: Every being  is determined in itself, is one with itself, and is consistent in itself
                iii.            Principle of Intelligibility: Everything that is, in so far as it is , is intelligible
                 iv.            Principle of Causality: Whatever comes to be has a cause
                   v.            Principle of Finality: Every agents acts //All beings when acting tend to some definite effect
                 vi.            Principle of the Excluded middle: There cannot be an intermediate between contradictions
              vii.            Principle of Sufficient Reason: Everything that exists has sufficient reason for its existence
4. Principles of Being:
 i. Causality and Participation:
     a. Causality is that from which something else proceeds with dependency in          being. There are 4 Types of causes  :
v  Efficient cause: That by which any change is brought about in order of execution in order of execution.
v  Material cause; That out which a new being arises-matter in regard to form
v  Formal cause: The act by which a material substratum  is determined towards a new being
v  Final cause: That because of which some is or becomes
     b. Participation; structural dependence of many beings on the one being. it means  to receive a part of what belongs to another fully and so merely sharing in it.

ii. Essence and Existence: Existence is the act whereby a thing is present in nature or in mind. Essence is mode or manner according to which really might be fashioned

iii. Potency and Act: Potency is the aptitude in a being to receive some  or perform an act . Act is the fully present realization of Potency.
    
5. Metaphysics and Education
 Education as an existent reality is falls under the wide world of metaphysics-which is the investigation of all reality.  All Educational content areas can be broadly classified under the branches of Metaphysics eg Physical sciences fall under cosmology(the study of the material universe), Social Sciences, mathematics, logic fall under Rational psychology/anthropology(the study of body mind relationship), Humanities and religion fall under Theodicy(the study of God) and its derivatives. Ontology (study of all being) is the mother of all disciplines. Principles of Metaphysics and Principles of Being can be used to explain any educational procedures, theory and praxis.